Monday, September 26, 2011

Over processed food!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/17/exploding-watermelons-chinese-farming

Above is the link to the article which talks about the exploding watermelons I talked about in class. Instead of allowing chickens, fruits, veggies, and other produce to grow at a normal rate we try and push it to the limit. . .this is what will happen if we continue on this destructive path.....(article posted below)

Exploding watermelons put spotlight on Chinese farming practices


New food scandal as fields of watermelons are destroyed after farmers mistakenly apply growth accelerator
 
Farmers clear burst watermelons from plastic greenhouses in Danyang, eastern China. Photograph: AP
The flying pips, shattered shells and wet shrapnel still haunt farmer Liu Mingsuo after an effort to chemically boost his fruit crop went spectacularly wrong.
Fields of watermelons exploded when he and other agricultural workers in eastern China mistakenly applied forchlorfenuron, a growth accelerator. The incident has become a focus of a Chinese media drive to expose the lax farming practices, shortcuts and excessive use of fertiliser behind a rash of food safety scandals.
It follows discoveries of the heavy metal cadmium in rice, toxic melamine in milk, arsenic in soy sauce, bleach in mushrooms, and the detergent borax in pork, added to make it resemble beef.
Compared to such cases of dangerous contamination, Liu's transgression was minor, but it has gained notoriety after being picked up by the state broadcaster, CCTV. The broadcaster blamed the bursting of the fruit on the legal chemical forchlorfenuron, which stimulates cell separation but often leaves melons misshapen and turns the seeds white.
The report said the farmers sprayed the fruit too late in the season and during wet conditions, which caused the melons to explode like "landmines". After losing three hectares (eight acres), Liu said he was unable to sleep because he could not shake the image of the fruit bursting. "On 7 May, I came out and counted 80 [burst watermelons] but by the afternoon it was 100," he said. "Two days later I didn't bother to count any more." About 20 farmers and 45 hectares around Danyang were affected. The fruit could not be sold and was instead fed to fish and pigs.
Farmers claim forchlorfenuron can bring the harvest forward by two weeks and increase the size and price of the fruit by more than 20%. Agricultural experts say forchlorfenuron has been widely used in China since the 1980s. Some said it was unsuitable for this fruit, but there was probably little health risk.
"In general we don't suggest chemicals with plant hormones be used on watermelons, as they are very sensitive. They might end up looking very strange and people will not want to buy them," said Cui Jian, director of the vegetable research institute at Qingdao Academy of Agricultural Science. "The taste won't be as good and storage is more difficult, but it should not harm anyone's health."
Environment groups say the overuse of agricultural chemicals is a problem that goes beyond growth stimulants.
Pan Jing of Greenpeace said farmers depended on fertilisers because many doubled as migrant workers and had less time for their crops. This dependency was promoted by state subsidies keeping fertilisers cheap. "The government is aware of the environmental problems caused by chemical fertiliser, but they are also concerned about food output."
Many farmers grow their own food separately from the chemically-raised crops they sell. "I feel there is nothing safe I can eat now because people are in too much of a hurry to make money," said Huang Zhanliang, a farmer in Hebei.
Concerns about food safety have lingered despite government promises to deal with the problem after six babies died and thousands became ill because of melamine-tainted milk in 2008.
The authorities appear to have mixed feelings about the role of the media and public opinion in naming and shaming culprits. In the wake of the melamine scandal, police jailed one of the parents, Zhao Lianhai, who had set up a website to expose the problem and appeal for justice. Recently, however, officials have encouraged coverage of food safety issues.
Zhang Yong, head of a new cabinet-level food safety commission, praised the media's "important watchdog role".
In the past week, the People's Daily website has run stories of human birth control chemicals being used on cucumber plants in Xian, China Daily has reported Sichuan peppers releasing red dye in water, and the Sina news portal revealed that barite powder had been injected into chickens in Guizhou to increase their weight.
More alarming still was a study by researchers at Nanjing Agricultural University that estimated a tenth of China's rice may be tainted with the cadmium, a heavy metal that can affect the nervous system. This caused a stir when it was published earlier this year in the pioneering Caixin magazine.
Many wary consumers choose to buy foreign products, which are seen as safer. But this is also vulnerable to mislabelling. The Fruit Industry Association of Guangdong province told reporters this week that "most 'imported' fruit are grown in China".

chapter 3

Chapter 3 CIVILIATIONS
In the introduction to chapter three the author mentions people having the “urge to escape from civilization” (55). The first thing I thought of was “can you really take what you have become and completely remove it from who you think you are?” Being civilized is more than eating with a fork and knife, many civilized cultures prefer to eat with their hands actually J Let’s say someone wants to go backpacking, have a really rustic experience, and they go in a group with a guide. The basics is all they will need. Well right there, you ruined it, there haven’t always been “the basics”. Lets look at a few reasons why this trip into the outback or wherever will still be a considered a civilized trip:
1.       Who carries more gear, probably the guide.
2.       What about water, you can’t drink mere water, it’ll be made safe by tablets to sanitize it or bottled water will be used.  
3.       What kind of clothing will you have? Guaranteed its state of the art hiking gear, nearly weightless sleeping bags very light jacks with extreme warmth and hiking books most definitely.
4.       Finally what will you eat? If it is a true adventure you will hunt and gather but if not your food will be nicely vacuum packed from REI.
How is that not being civilized????

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Notes: Writing and Power (Background)

  • Thoughts could be shaped, codified, and transmitted over both distance and time
  • Laws could be written and interpreted or enforced by those who could record or read them
  • Writing gave to some the power to bind a people together by giving them a  shared history, common literature, untied world-view and shared cosmology
    • Cosmology – branch of philosophy that deals with the origin, process, structure of the universe
  • By studying written explanations of creation, historians can come to understand a particular people’s value system, view of itself, and relationship of the people to the world, universe, god or gods
  • Beginning about 6,000 y.a. people began to develop more complex and codified forms of written comm…
  • 2 types of writing
    • Ideographic – thought writing, evolved from using pictures to represent things or thoughts
    • Phonetic – writing that only a few signs need to be memorized and signs can be grouped in almost endless number of ways creating new words

Creation Story Comparison

Creation Stories

To try and keep all opinions or preformed ideas about these readings out, instead of using the titles I will just named the source number. The first of the two sources that I looked at in detail is Source Three. Source three has a God who is said to begin to create. This God starts with nature and slowly moves on to animals. His accomplishments are measured in days and on the seventh day he blesses it and deems it a holy day. He wishes to make man in “our image, after our likeness”. God is convinced that they shall rule and just the same as he spoke to the animals he wants them to “be fertile and Increase”. The difference is that he wants man to fill the earth and master it. After man was created he was meant to till and tend all of the plants because these plants would feed him. I thought it was interesting that man in this creation story was a farmer, so a gatherer and not a hunter. As a side note I thought it very important that in this story man was made from dust of the earth.
            As for Source Five there was the Creator, the Maker, Tepeu, Gucumatz, and the Forefathers. They decided collectively that there needed to be a surface for the earth. It was made very clear however that there was nothing grand until human was created. As for Source Three, God never states that other creations are not valued as much as humans. The first creation in Source Five is the earth, followed by the animals but the initial life (Creators, Makers, if we can say that) was frustrated because the animals couldn’t speak like men and speak of the Creators and Makers. In both stories the creators were left upset at some point or another because in the first mentioned, the first man ate from the only tree he was told to avoid so he was cursed by god. In the second story, the Creators asked what they thought to be a small task of the animals, (to say their names) but they could not. In Source Five the Creators then tried to make a man out of mud but when that failed, the man was made out of wood. The wooden men multiplied as if their creator had told them to be fertile and increase. Eventually the man made of wood gave way to his lack of soul, and reverence for their Creator and Makers so they were no longer favored by them. At the end of the story it says, “Because these wooden men and women did not honor or worship their creator, they were destroyed in a flood. Their descendants, monkeys, lived in the forest and resembled humans. The few people who escaped the deluge did praise the gods and thus became true human beings”. It is my opinion that the men created in both stories lost sight of creation and unfortunately lacked the respect for the “bigger picture”. 

Friday, September 9, 2011

Thirsty? The need for Water in Ancient Societies

Within the first few lines, the handout asks a question; "What distinguishes human cultures that are termed civilizations from those that are not?" I could say with confidence that cities was not the answer I would have come up with. It makes complete sense after reading all of the evidence to support it, and looking back I have no idea what makes more sense, but cities seem so specific. I like the idea of what cities represent, "any society in which thousands of people live in proximity to one another must agree in general to certain laws or rules governing human behavior." When I got to the part about the drawing of the early Egyptian king cutting an irrigation ditch I am still unclear as to why he is present in that drawing. From what I understand about the limited information I have regarding Egyptian culture, the King would never be doing labor.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Prologue

I can already tell I love this book. Not only does the text use concise, to the point language, (unlike any other history book I have ever read) but the way the information is revealed makes it memorable. For instance, "The Three Cs of World History". Time and time again I have taken college courses that require so much memorization. Basically what I do is memorize the material to pass the quiz or test but if I don't need to apply it to something or explain it back, what is the use of keeping this information? I feel like almost immediately the information leaves my brain in half of the time it took me to study it. Reading something in a history book however that takes terms such as "changes" and spins them not only into helping me understand the past but also relating the term to the current helps me not only remember this term but also the usage.

As for a couple other things that struck me in the reading, I think it is insane that someone or a group of people decided to turn the whole history of the universe into a cosmic calender. I think it is brilliant, as long as it's accurate that is, (or accurate as far as we can tell). I think the fact that the writer took the whole history of the human species and turned it into a paragraph is unreal. I can't image condensing something so vast into literally five inches.

Lastly I couldn't end this blog without mentioning Voltaire's quote, "This little globe, nothing more than a point, rolls in space like so many other globes; we are lost in this immensity" (Strayer, xliii). I hope we discuss how people interpret this quote.

Friday, September 2, 2011

Surpised Myself

Pretty Impressed! This took me way less time than last semester!